Contribute

The views shared on The Mideast Peace Pulse are those of the author(s) and not those of Israel Policy Forum.

IPF Letter in The New York Times

It is sobering yet productive that three distinguished Israelis are generating ideas despite the unfortunate but realistic conclusion that “a comprehensive peace agreement is unattainable right now.”

In Meeting, A Chance for A Regional Approach

Today, President Barack Obama meets with Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu after weeks of speculation about how the two countries will address the threat of Iran potentially obtaining nuclear weapons, and with little expectation for progress on Israeli-Palestinian peacemaking.  However, the Iranian threat – coupled with the historic changes of governments across the Middle East – could actually serve as a strategic opportunity for these leaders to address Iran while advancing regional democratic efforts alongside Israeli-Palestinian peace.

The Right Balance on Iran

Israel Policy Forum applauds President Barack Obama’s commitment to Israel’s security outlined in his address to the American Israel Public Affairs Committee.

Tags

Bibi's Political Situation: Not Our Problem

Nahum Barnea is Israel's top political reporter but his recent report on President Obama's sensitivity to Prime Minister Netanyahu's precarious political position surely represents nothing but spin by the Prime Minister's office.

Barnea reported last week that in a phone call President Obama asked Netanyahu what the political constraints were that limit his ability to engage in negotiations with the Palestinians. What would Lieberman let him do?  The Likud ultraright?  The settlers? Obama then assured Netanyahu that he would not push him beyond those limits.

 I can''t believe such a conversation ever took place.

Why would the American President care about what the constraints on Netanyahu are? Worse come to worst, we push him too far, his government collapses, and Tzipi Livni comes in.

Or Ehud Barak or whoever.

It is not our business. That conversation might make sense if the Israei prime minister was considered critical to US interests --  like Yitzhak Rabin -- who was in synch with US policies. Neither Obama nor Clinton have any use for Bibi.  Why would they bend our policies to accommodate him?

The answer. They wouldn't. 

Here's a more likely Obama-Netanyahu phone conversation.

Obama: "So Bibi.  Anything we can do to help you get Lieberman out of the foreign ministry?"

Bibi: "I feel you, sir.  But the prosecutors are taking care of that."

Obama: "Well, let me know.  We can help if you want us to."

Bibi: "Most def, sir."

Now that is a conversation I can believe in, even if I just made it up. 

 

 

 

 

Trackback URL: http://israelpolicyforum.ngphost.com/trackback/1369

Comments

It's possible, but....

Could it partially true? 

This seems possible:  "Barnea reported last week that in a phone call President Obama asked Netanyahu what the political constraints were that limit his ability to engage in negotiations with the Palestinians. What would Lieberman let him do?  The Likud ultraright?  The settlers?"

Obama is practical.

However, the last sentence sounds like propaganda:  "Obama then assured Netanyahu that he would not push him beyond those limits."

It also would mean Obama has learned nothing from the Oslo Process.  Israel will not push beyond its "limits" and reach peace.  Hence, the necessity of the United States to push both sides.  The US has been accommodating Isarel's political limits since 1993.  Look how that turned out for the two-state solution.  

 

Corruption

Thank god people as loathsome as Lieberman tend also to commit crimes, even if their views aren't enough to keep them from public office.